Stress corrosion
cracking test

Immersion test in five corrosive media on 6×1 stacks compressed to 80% of travel, at 80 °C and 40 °C. It measures service life to fracture, expressed in hours (limit 2,500 h). It reflects the real-world scenario of springs under permanent preload — flange gaskets, valves, clutches.

FIG · Test setup
Sealed container vessel with a 6×1 stack of disc springs in compression, immersed in a corrosive solution for the stress corrosion cracking test
Sealed container vessel with a 6×1 stack compressed inside, immersed in the corrosive solution.
Load
80% travel
Test temp.
80 °C · 40 °C
Media
5 solutions
Limit
2.500 h
— It is the usual scenario for
Case 01

Flange gaskets with preload springs (oil & gas, chemical, food)

Case 02

Valves with disc-spring closure

Case 03

Pretensioned assemblies that stay under load throughout their service life

Case 04

Any disc spring working as a static force spring

01

Test preparation

Assembly of the parts: 6×1 stacks (six disc springs in series, stacked face-to-face per DIN 2093) with initial compression to 80% of travel via an internal guide. Each stack is placed in a sealed glass container vessel. The vessel is filled with the corrosive solution, fully immersing the stack.

Chambers and temperatures: first test at 80 °C — the most severe condition, which accelerates the corrosion process. Second test at 40 °C — repeated only for the combinations that fractured at 80 °C, since at a lower temperature the corrosion rate decreases and the results can only be equal or better.

Procedure: daily visual inspection, solution renewed every 2 weeks. The test is considered complete when a part of the stack fractures or upon reaching 2,500 h without fracture. Each combination is repeated several times; the worst time is taken as the result.

02

Test results at 80 °C

Service life to fracture · 80% compression · limit 2,500 h

Scale> 2.500 h 1.200 – 2.500 h 300 – 1.200 h < 300 h
Stress corrosion cracking test results at 80 °C: hours to fracture by material and corrosive medium
Spring · Material · FinishSeawaterDIN 50905MgCl₂ 40%magnesium chlorideNaCl 3%sodium chlorideNaOH 0,1Nsodium hydroxideC₈H₈O₇ 0,1Mcitric acid
— Stainless steels without coating
C-63 · 1.4310 · Estampado · Rectificado>2500356 h>2500>2500>2500
C-63 · 1.4310 · Shot peened>2500429 h>2500>2500>2500
B-80 · 1.4310 · Estampado · Rectificado>25001968 h>2500>2500>2500
C-63 · 1.4568 · Estampado · Rectificado>2500140 h>2500>2500>2500
C-63 · 1.4568 · Shot peened>2500140 h>2500>2500>2500
C-63 · 1.4568 · Shot peened · Kolsterised284 h2177 h>2500>2500>2500
— 51CrV4 steel with coatings
51CrV4 · Yellow zinc plating912 h>2500>2500>250068 h
51CrV4 · Clear zinc plating1129 h>2500>2500>250068 h
51CrV4 · Dacromet>2500>2500>2500>2500891 h
51CrV4 · Geomet>2500>2500>2500>2500891 h
51CrV4 · Delta Tone + Delta Seal620 h>2500738 h>2500526 h
51CrV4 · Water-thinned paint1057 h837 h45 h>2500380 h
51CrV4 · Oiled837 h>2500360 h>2500262 h
— Reading by medium
01
NaOH 0.1N

All stacks exceed 2,500 h without fracture, even those whose coating dissolved completely (the water-thinned paint dissolved in 2 days, but the part did not fracture). In media with pH > 10, a protective oxide/hydroxide layer forms.

02
MgCl₂ 40%

A critical medium for stainless steels. The 1.4310 fractures between 356 h and 1,968 h; the 1.4568 without Kolsterising, at 140 h. The Kolsterised version holds up to 2,177 h, but offsets this by performing worse in seawater (284 h).

03
Seawater

Most stainless steels hold up > 2,500 h, except the 1.4568 Kolsterised. Zinc-based coatings (zinc plating, Delta Tone, oiled) and paint begin to show failures.

04
NaCl 3%

A benign medium under load for stainless steels (> 2,500 h in all cases). Some coatings fail: paint (45 h), oiled (360 h), Delta Tone (738 h).

05
Citric acid 0.1M

Catastrophic for zinc coatings. Zinc-plated parts fracture in 68 h. Dacromet and Geomet hold up to 891 h. Stainless steels exceed 2,500 h without problems.

03

Test results at 40 °C

Only combinations that fractured at 80 °C · the rest assumed > 2,500 h

To assess the effect of temperature on stress corrosion cracking, the test is repeated at 40 °C only on the combinations that fractured at 80 °C. The rest are assumed to be > 2,500 h as well, since at a lower temperature the corrosion rate can only decrease.

Stress corrosion cracking test results at 40 °C: hours to fracture by material and corrosive medium, for combinations that fractured at 80 °C
Spring · Material · FinishSeawaterDIN 50905MgCl₂ 40%magnesium chlorideNaCl 3%sodium chlorideNaOH 0,1Nsodium hydroxideC₈H₈O₇ 0,1Mcitric acid
— Stainless steels without coating
C-63 · 1.4310 · Estampado · Rectificado>2500
C-63 · 1.4310 · Shot peened>2500
B-80 · 1.4310 · Estampado · Rectificado>2500
C-63 · 1.4568 · Estampado · Rectificado>2500
C-63 · 1.4568 · Shot peened>2500
C-63 · 1.4568 · Shot peened · Kolsterised>2500>2500
— 51CrV4 steel with coatings
51CrV4 · Yellow zinc plating>250045 h
51CrV4 · Clear zinc plating>2500284 h
51CrV4 · Dacromet>2500
51CrV4 · Geomet>2500
51CrV4 · Delta Tone + Delta Seal>2500>2500>2500
51CrV4 · Water-thinned paint834 h694 h116 h1917 h
51CrV4 · Oiled>2500>2500356 h

· Empty cells: not tested at 40 °C because it already exceeded 2,500 h at 80 °C.

— Reading at 40 °C
01

At 40 °C, many materials that failed at 80 °C now exceed 2,500 h. Temperature is one of the most decisive factors in stress corrosion cracking.

02

The oiled parts, which gave the worst result in free immersion, offer reasonable resistance at 40 °C: they only fracture in citric acid (356 h). The oil layer limits direct contact with the medium for as long as the part is under load, delaying crack propagation — even though it does not prevent visual corrosion.

03

Water-thinned paint remains unreliable under load even at 40 °C: fractures at 694 h in MgCl₂ and 116 h in NaCl.

04

Dacromet and Geomet improve their behavior in citric acid from 891 h (at 80 °C) to > 2,500 h (at 40 °C). Temperature is a critical factor for these coatings in acidic media.

Shall we talk about your project?

Tell us about your use case and our engineering team will advise you on choosing the optimal solution.

04

Comparison · no load vs. under load (80 °C)

Hours are converted to the same B / M / P / MP scale for direct comparison

To directly compare the under-load test results with those of the no-load test, the hours are converted to the same qualitative visual scale. The rating considers both fracture and the visual condition of the part — one that held > 2,500 h but ended up with severe corrosion is not considered fit for continued service.

— Hours → scale conversion
B B · > 2,500 h without fracture · low corrosion
M M · 1,200 – 2,500 h or visible staining
P P · 300 – 1,200 h or thin corrosion layer
MP MP · < 300 h or thick corrosion layer
Comparison table: rating of each material/coating with no load vs. under load at 80 °C, in four corrosive media
Material / CoatingMgCl₂ 40%NaCl 3%NaOH 0,1NCitric acid
s/t c/ts/t c/ts/t c/ts/t c/t
C-63 · 1.4310 M P B B B B B B
C-63 · 1.4310 · Shot peened M P B B B B B B
B-80 · 1.4310 M M B B B B B B
C-63 · 1.4568 M MP B B B B B B
C-63 · 1.4568 · Shot peened P MP M B B B B B
C-63 · 1.4568 · Shot peened · Kolsterised MP M P B B B B B
Yellow zinc plating B B P B B B MP MP
Clear zinc plating B B M B B B MP MP
Dacromet B B B B B B MP P
Geomet B B B B B B MP P
Delta Tone + Delta Seal B B M P B B P P
Nickel plating P P B P
Water-thinned paint B P B MP M B P P
Oiled MP B MP P B B MP MP

s/t = no load · c/t = under load at 80 °C

— Key takeaways from the comparison
SCC

Stainless steels perform worse under load in MgCl₂ 40%

1.4310 drops from M to P; 1.4568 drops from M to MP. Stress corrosion cracking shows up clearly.

Benign medium

NaOH 0.1N stays robust under load

It is the only medium where most combinations keep their rating when moving from free immersion to immersion under load.

Acid + load

Citric acid worsens some coatings under load

Delta Tone and oiled drop in quality. Zinc coatings are sensitive to the acid + stress combination.

Top performers

Dacromet and Geomet are the most stable protections

They keep a B rating in three media under load. They only fail in citric acid — expected given their zinc base.

06

Frequently asked questions

01 Why do stainless steels fracture in MgCl₂ 40% under load if in free immersion they only got stained?

This is the phenomenon of stress corrosion cracking (SCC), specifically the sensitivity of austenitic stainless steels to chlorides. In the no-load test, chloride ions create surface pitting but the material holds. Under 80% compression, that pitting acts as a stress concentrator where transgranular cracks nucleate and propagate until complete fracture. This is why the MgCl₂ 40% solution is the international standard medium for evaluating SCC in stainless steels — its aggressiveness under load is disproportionately high compared with free immersion.

02 Why is the test run at 80 °C and not at room temperature?

Because at 80 °C the corrosion rate increases significantly and the test is accelerated, making it possible to discriminate differences between materials within reasonable timeframes (weeks instead of months). Once the critical combinations are identified at 80 °C, they are repeated at 40 °C to assess whether the real service temperature is low enough to maintain the integrity of the part. If a combination fails at 80 °C but exceeds 2,500 h at 40 °C, it is viable in applications at room or moderate temperature.

03 If my spring is going to work under permanent load in seawater at room temperature, which material do I choose?

For seawater under permanent load, the stainless steels 1.4310 (Stamped or Shot peened) and B-80 · 1.4310 are safe: they exceed 2,500 h at 80 °C without fracture, which implies indefinite life at room temperature. The 1.4568 Kolsterised is the exception to avoid — it fractures at 284 h at 80 °C. Among the coatings, Dacromet and Geomet on 51CrV4 also exceed 2,500 h in seawater under load. Zinc platings, Delta Tone, paint and oiling can be lower-cost options if the spring is not critical.

04 What does "80% compression" of travel mean?

The travel of a disc spring is the difference between its free height and its flat height (fully compressed). Compression to 80% of travel means the part is deformed to 80% of its maximum deflection capacity, generating approximately 80% of its nominal load. This condition simulates the realistic worst case of a spring working as a permanent force element — compressed near the operating limit, but still without entering the material's plastic yield zone.

05 Why do oiled parts hold up reasonably under load despite not protecting against free immersion?

The oil layer is not a chemical barrier like a zinc coating or a chromate — it is a hydrophobic film that limits direct contact between the aqueous medium and the steel surface for a time. Under prolonged free immersion the oil eventually washes off and the substrate is exposed, which is why it gives poor results. However, in the under-load test the service life to fracture is usually short (days or weeks), and the oil holds up during that limited time window. It is not a long-term protection, but it delays the propagation of SCC cracks long enough for many real applications to remain functional.

Shall we talk about your project?

Tell us about your use case and our engineering team will advise you on choosing the optimal solution.