Corrosion testing
on disc springs

Real laboratory data on stainless steels (1.4310, 1.4568) and eight anti-corrosion coatings against six corrosive media: seawater, 40% MgCl₂, 3% NaCl, 0.1N NaOH, 0.1M citric acid and deionized water. Four test blocks — unstressed, stressed, fatigued and VDA cyclic test — to reflect real working conditions.

FIG. 01 — FOUR TEST STATES
Diagram of the four corrosion test states for disc springs
Materials
2 stainless + 8 coatings
Media
6 solutions
Measurements
G/M/P/VP · hours · cycles
01

Why four types of test?

Disc springs typically work under high loads and, in many sectors, in the presence of moisture, salt-laden atmospheres, acids, cleaning agents or seawater.

The combination of mechanical stress + corrosive agent + temperature + fatigue is what determines the spring's real service life.

The behavior of a disc spring against corrosion changes drastically depending on its load state and environmental exposure. That is why the tests have been organized into four blocks that reproduce the four real working scenarios of the spring.

In international technical terminology, these are known as corrosion tests on disc springs (also Belleville washers corrosion testing), and they include immersion tests, stress corrosion cracking tests and corrosion fatigue tests.

02

The four test blocks

Each block measures a different metric · Direct access to each one

BLOCK 01 01

Unstressed

Free immersion · 4 weeks at room temperature.

Reveals the intrinsic behavior of the material or coating against the corrosive agent, with no influence from internal stresses. It is the cleanest test for comparing materials and protections.

Metric Visual scale G / M / P / VP
Duration 4 weeks
Samples 14 references
Media 4 media
View block
BLOCK 02 02

Stressed

6×1 stack at 80% of travel · 80 °C and 40 °C.

Introduces the stress corrosion cracking (SCC) factor. Under load, certain stainless steels can fracture even in media where the material on its own performs well.

Metric Hours to fracture · limit 2,500 h
Duration Up to 2,500 h
Samples 13 references
Media 5 media
View block
BLOCK 03 03

Fatigued

Servo-hydraulic press · cycles at 20–60% and 20–80% of travel.

Combines corrosion with the cyclic wear that locally destroys the passive layer, opening up zones of accelerated electrochemical corrosion. Reflects springs in dynamic applications.

Metric No. of cycles to fracture
Duration 63 kN · 100 mm
Samples 14 references
Media 4 media
View block
BLOCK 04 04

VDA test

Cyclic climatic chamber · VDA 230-213 cycles on material and coating.

Accelerated test in a climatic chamber combining salt spray, high humidity and drying at alternating temperatures. Recognized as an automotive benchmark — it complements the immersion tests when you want to correlate with outdoor service life or marine atmospheres.

Metric Appearance + Δ coating
Duration 6 weeks (VDA cycles)
Samples To be defined
Media Salt spray + humidity
View block
03

Methodology · samples, materials and media

The test methods used aim to cover the spectrum of conditions that can affect a disc spring in service.

Combining temperature, stress state and corrosive medium, the possible scenarios are almost unlimited: corrosion does not affect a part deflected to 10% of its travel the same way as one at 80%, nor does an environment at 40 °C behave like one at 80 °C. For this reason, a set of tests with the broadest and most representative combination of factors possible has been selected.

The VDA test is included, for its recognition as a benchmark, as a complement to the unstressed immersion tests — for which no standard exists. The immersion tests run for 4 weeks with no contact with the environment. The specific details of each test are spelled out in its own block.

The samples, dimensions, materials and coatings are consistent across all four blocks, which allows a direct comparison of the effect of adding stress, fatigue or climatic cycles to the same spring exposed to the same medium. All geometries comply with DIN 2093 / DIN EN 16983; the stainless steels are manufactured by stamping and grinding, and the coatings are applied on standard 51CrV4 spring steel.

Samples tested
Dimensions, standard and series of the disc springs used across all test blocks
Dimensions Do × Di × h × t (mm)StandardSeries
63 × 31 × 1,9 × 4,5DIN 2093C
80 × 41 × 3,0 × 5,3DIN 2093B
63 × 31 × 1.8 × 4.15DIN 2093C var.

Stainless steels tested

X10CrNi18-8 / AISI 301

1.4310

Standard austenitic stainless steel

X10CrNi18-8

1.4310 · SP

Shot peened for fatigue resistance

X7CrNiAl17-7 / 17-7 PH

1.4568

Precipitation hardened

X7CrNiAl17-7

1.4568 · SP

Shot peened + 17-7 PH

X7CrNiAl17-7 + C

1.4568 · SP + Kolst.

Carbon diffusion — wear resistance

Coatings tested (on 51CrV4)

Yellow galvanized

Mechanical zinc plating + yellow chromate

Clear galvanized

Mechanical zinc plating + clear chromate

Dacromet

Zinc-aluminum flakes

Geomet

Hexavalent chromium-free · Dacromet successor

Delta Tone + Delta Seal

Zinc base + polymer topcoat

Nickel plating

Electroless nickel plating

Water-based paint

Water-based organic coating

Oiling

Storage protection only

See the technical description of the base materials and the anti-corrosion coatings for detailed information.

Corrosive media

01

Seawater

DIN 50905

53.5% salt · pH 7.8–8.2

Offshore · marine

02

MgCl₂ 40%

Extreme chloride concentration

Standard for SCC in stainless steels

03

NaCl 3%

3% aqueous solution

Automotive · de-icing salts

04

NaOH 0,1N

Alkaline solution · pH > 10

CIP cleaning · chemical

05

C₆H₈O₇ 0,1M

Weak organic acid

Food · cleaning

06

Salt spray

DIN 50021

Accelerated salt spray

Marine atmospheric

07

Deionized H₂O

No aggressive chemistry

Isolate pure fatigue

Procedure by block

Block 01

Unstressed

  • Exposure Full immersion · 4 weeks
  • Temperature Room (20–25 °C)
  • Aeration No air introduced
  • Load Free part · no preload
  • Renewal None during the test
Block 02

Stressed

  • Stack 6 × 1 · in series
  • Compression 80% of travel
  • Temperature 80 °C · 40 °C (verification)
  • Renewal Every 2 weeks
  • End criterion Fracture or 2,500 h
Block 03

Fatigued

  • Stack 6 × 1 · inner guide
  • Cycles 20–80% and 20–60% of travel
  • Equipment 63 kN · 100 mm · servo-hydraulic
  • Lubrication No lubrication
  • End criterion Fracture · measured in no. of cycles
Block 04

VDA test

  • Stack Individual samples in chamber
  • Cycles VDA 230-213 (spray · humidity · drying)
  • Equipment Cyclic climatic chamber
  • Renewal Continuous (cyclic program)
  • End criterion Visual inspection · Δ coating
Validity note

The results are indicative. They reflect exactly the test conditions (geometry, material, coating, medium, temperature, load, cycle). In a real application, variations in any of these factors can change the behavior. To size a specific case, we recommend contacting the engineering department to validate the choice of material and protection before manufacturing.

Want to talk about your project?

Tell us your use case and our engineering team will advise you on choosing the optimal solution.

04

Comparative summary · cross-readings

Each block measures a different metric — visual scale, hours, cycles or post-chamber appearance — but all four can be cross-referenced to make decisions. The following findings are the most relevant for designing springs under corrosion.

If the application combines several factors (load + chlorides, acid + fatigue, outdoor exposure, etc.), it is best to choose the material/coating based on all four blocks at once, not just the free-immersion one.

Comparison of the four corrosion test blocks on disc springs
BlockWhat it measuresResult metricAccess
UnstressedIntrinsic resistance of the material/coatingVisual scale G / M / P / VP after 4 weeksView block 01 →
StressedService life under constant load in a corrosive mediumHours to fracture (limit 2,500 h)View block 02 →
FatiguedService life under compression cycles in a corrosive mediumNumber of cycles to fractureView block 03 →
VDA testResistance to accelerated climatic cycles (salt spray + humidity)Visual inspection · Δ coating after 6 weeksView block 04 →
— Cross-cutting conclusions
— Universal material

There is no universal material

The best stainless steel or coating depends on the medium, the temperature and the load state. There are counterintuitive combinations: oiling, poor in free immersion, is acceptable under load.

— Chlorides + load

40% MgCl₂ is the most aggressive scenario for stainless steels under load

Rapid fracture even in 1.4310 and 1.4568 — between 140 h and 1,968 h at 80 °C. It is the international standard medium for evaluating SCC in austenitic steels.

— Zinc + acid

Citric acid dissolves zinc coatings

Zinc reacts directly with the acid and dissolves. Galvanized finishes, Dacromet and Geomet fail in short timeframes. In those environments: stainless steel.

— Benign medium

0.1N NaOH is the most benign

Both stainless steels and most coatings withstand > 2,500 h without fracture. Protective oxide/hydroxide layers form.

— Shot peened

Shot peening improves fatigue, not chemical corrosion

The residual compressive stresses delay crack nucleation — a clear improvement in the 20-80% and 20-60% tests. It is not an anti-corrosion protection in itself.

05

Applications where these tests are relevant

The test data applies to the design of disc springs in sectors where the corrosion + load combination is common. If the application combines several factors, it is best to choose the material/coating based on all four blocks at once, not just the free-immersion one.

01

Automotive

De-icing salts (NaCl) · coastal salt-laden atmospheres · brake fluids or coolants.

02

Oil and gas

Seawater · flange joints under permanent preload · offshore environments.

03

Chemical and pharmaceutical

CIP cleaning with NaOH · acidic products in process lines.

04

Food

Citric acid as an ingredient or cleaner · NaOH in sanitization.

05

Energy

Turbines · safety valves · control systems under fatigue.

06

Construction

Pre-tensioned anchors exposed to urban, marine or industrial atmospheres.

06

Frequently asked questions

01 Which is more reliable for choosing a material: an unstressed test or a stressed one?

It depends on the application. If the spring will work free or with very little preload in a corrosive environment (storage or intermittent use), the unstressed test is representative. If it will be permanently or cyclically compressed, the stressed test is essential: under load, stress corrosion cracking (SCC) phenomena appear that are not seen in free immersion. We recommend always reviewing the block that reproduces the real load state.

02 Why does shot peening improve fatigue but not always improve corrosion?

Shot peening introduces residual surface compressive stresses that hinder the nucleation and propagation of fatigue cracks — hence the improvement in the cyclic tests. However, it provides no chemical protection against corrosion: it deposits no protective layer and can increase surface roughness, increasing the area exposed to attack. In the unstressed and static-stress tests, shot peening offers no advantage over the untreated material.

03 Which anti-corrosion coating would you recommend for a marine environment?

In a marine atmosphere (humidity + chlorides), Geomet and Delta Tone + Delta Seal offer the best protection/cost ratio on 51CrV4 base steel: they withstand salt spray and immersion in NaCl without significant degradation over the 4 weeks of testing. For springs under permanent preload in direct contact with seawater, the 1.4310 and 1.4568 steels are the most robust alternative — especially if the design requires resistance to stress corrosion cracking (SCC).

04 How valid is an accelerated test compared to a real application?

Accelerated tests are valid for comparing the relative behavior of materials and coatings under controlled conditions. Extrapolating to real service life requires knowing the equivalence factor between the test and the service conditions, which varies depending on the dominant mechanism. These results are interpreted as ranking indicators, not as predictors of service life. To size with confidence, we recommend combining them with field experience under similar conditions.

05 Do these tests replace a test specific to my application?

Not as a certification. If your application requires regulatory compliance (NACE MR0175, ISO 15156, EFC, or similar), you need an accredited test to the specific standard. These blocks are designed to guide the selection of material and coating before the certification phase. Our engineers can advise you on which standard applies in your sector and how to interpret the results in that context.

Want to talk about your project?

Tell us your use case and our engineering team will advise you on choosing the optimal solution.